Latest headlines

Monday, August 20, 2007

Public health boss blasts Maclean's for HPV 'guinea pig' hysteria

"Our girls are not guinea pigs" declares the front page of this week's issue of Maclean's magazine, citing safety concerns about Gardasil, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

The morning after Emily Cunningham got a shot of Gardasil, the new vaccine that protects against four strains of the human papilloma virus (HPV) that can cause cervical cancer and genital warts, she woke up with a headache, and neck and back pain. By 9 p.m. that evening in April, she had a fever so high "you could feel the heat rising from her a foot away," according to her mother, Laurie. She was delirious during the night, and the following day couldn't walk without assistance. Bedridden for nearly a week, the 18-year-old from Wyoming missed school, and took Tylenol every four hours. "If Emily had been the only one to get sick we would have said she must have had something else [like the flu]," explained Laurie, "but we know of three other students to have reactions, that is why we are concerned."

Emily's story is only one of 1,637 complaints involving Gardasil, filed as of May to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national surveillance database sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States.
The magazine's accusations outraged Dr David Butler-Jones, the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada and head of the Public Health Agency of Canada. He wrote to the magazine's editors last Friday to express his concerns:
Having a healthy debate is essential; however, Dr. Butler-Jones believes that the way Maclean's has approached the issue of the HPV vaccine is inappropriate and one-sided. The suggestion that as public health officials we would support a vaccine that would put the health, or worse, the lives, of girls and women at risk, is irresponsible. The health and safety of Canadians is of paramount importance to me and to public health officials across the country.

The Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health concurred with Dr Butler-Jones. Dr Perry Kendall, chief medical officer of BC (where the vaccine looks set to be administered soon) told the Canadian Press that the article was "alarmist."

In the current issue of NRM, Owen Dyer questions why the vaccine programs have been implemented so hurriedly. (HPV vaccine programs have already been put in place in Newfoundland and Labrador, PEI, Nova Scotia and Ontario.) In addition to speaking to epidemiologist Dr Abby Lippman about the safety and efficacy questions raised by her recent CMAJ commentary (PDF), Mr Dyer raises questions about potential conflicts of interest in Merck dealings with staffers in the offices of Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Ontario health minister George Smitherman. Also, it turns out the SOGC's research that supports the vaccination programs was funded by Merck -- to the tune of $1.5 million.

Photo: www.petsworld.co.uk
Check out our website: www.nationalreviewofmedicine.com

4 comments:

  1. I don't know how telling the truth can be alarmist, and in the absence of any long term studies establishing either it's safety or efficacy how can the article be charged with being one sided?

    What we know is this, some people think, but do not know that the Vaccine may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. The vaccine might prevent more sickness and death than it may cause, but there is absolutely no long term data that supports this theory. There are strong indications that some who have taken the vaccine may have been made very very sick by it, again it is not known if this is true nor are there any numbers to quantify possible risks and possible dangers. Merk has spent Billions of dollars presenting one side of the theory, one magazine has written one article that presents the opposing view and they are considered reckless. Does this seem to be a reasonable charge?

    ReplyDelete
  2. After reading the article I am very happy to know the content which will be very important for me because I needed to know it for treatment to all patients.

    ReplyDelete
  3. An additional region that men and women mistake a great deal will be they chanel outlet which monetary analysts will also be insurance coverage brokers or even accountantsIn conditions associated with determining requirements being a 'financial planner' right now there is not a lot that must be carried out beyond dangling indicative upward which states 'financial counselor. wi They may finish with an chanel outlet soups associated with characters following their own titles, however CFP (brief with regard to licensed monetary adviser) is certainly the actual substantial abilities. The CFP standing is important and it is the first indication how the individual you should do company along with is actually skilled the actual chanel outlet business. Anyone who bears the actual CFP standing is actually about getting ongoing training as well as strength instruction. The actual CFP abilities is a good transmission that the feasible supervisor can provide seem monetary help. That said, due to the fact you have handed the actual audit does not imply you've the actual trustworthiness as well as abilities required for every client. Just like most critical way of life choices, help to make louis vuitton replica you're really comprehensive regarding choosing your supervisor. Typically, monetary experts generate their own earnings possibly through profits or even through getting usual or even toned costs for his or her knowledge. Typically the louis vuitton replica is actually compensated whenever an individual purchases or even offers share or even another kind of expense.

    ReplyDelete