After a CBC News article reported that a man nearly died from his flu shot, hundreds of readers have commenced what amounts to an collective online panic attack.
CBC News reported Wednesday that Richard Ryan, a 44-year-old man from New Westminster, BC, was paralyzed for nearly five months and still remains ill as a result of Guillain-Barré syndrome, a serious autoimmune neurological disease that occurs very rarely as a side effect of the flu vaccine. Guillain-Barré occurs in around one in a million patients who receive the flu shot. But the rather alarmist headline read "B.C. man paralyzed after flu shot warns of risks."
In two days, the article has received over 300 comments written by CBC News readers. (Comments were posted both on cbcnews.ca and on Yahoo News, where the article was syndicated. The article itself also received attention from the Fox News website in the US.)
Predictably, remarks denouncing the vaccine have proliferated. "That is some scary, scary stuff," wrote one reader. "Thats almost as scary as the carrot juice that paralyzed that person last year. I will never drink carrot juice again. Nor will I take a flu shot. I heard that it has been linked to alzheimers." Another, under the pseudonym "skip the shot," claimed the risk of contracting Guillain-Barré syndrome from the vaccine is actually 100 times higher than it has typically been estimated. Many readers proclaimed their intention to decline vaccination in the future.
Keep in mind that a study last year by the Toronto-based Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) reported that Canadian influenza vaccination rates, despite more than doubling since 1997, are still too low. And drops in other vaccination rates -- such as the MMR shot in Great Britain, after the now-disproved Dr Andrew Wakefield thimerosal/mercury scare -- have resulted in recent warnings about potential epidemics of diseases like measles and mumps that could easily be prevented by immunization. Canadian MMR vaccination rates were only slightly lower than had been projected after the Wakefield warnings, the CMAJ has reported; however, outbreaks of mumps in Canada have been traced back to the UK.
So, the question is: Did CBC News act responsibly by publicizing the story of one man whose case, according to a neurologist, is not representative and not making sufficiently clear the calculations and balancing of risks that have gone into developing public health and vaccination recommendations over the years? There's no denying the public has a right to know what is going on, but at some point the editorial decision-making process has to draw a line about what is newsworthy and what is sensationalist.
Photo: Shutterstock
Friday, 24 October, 2008
Rx: A healthy dose of reason?
Posted by
David Elkins and others
at
4:49 PM
Labels: autism, epidemiology, journalism, vaccines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

RE: the "flu" shot:
ReplyDeleteI have never had the flu shot.
My simple method of decision-making is to monitor whether doctors get the " flu" shot.
When it appears to me that they "practice what they preach" ..then.. I might consider it.
Let's have a poll on how many doctors get the "flu" shot.
RE: Guillain Barre
Once upon a time I participated in a group discussion about an ER patient experiencing progressive paralysis ...what could it be?
I suggested Guillain Barre ...and so it was.
However my predominant thought ...as the least skilled person in the group .... was "what happens to patients that are not correctly diagnosed ?"
A correct diagnosis of Guillain Barre facilitates " timely" life-saving intervention.
RE: reporting ethics
you know ... there is a small significant part of me that believes there is always a "method" behind ?madness.
Perhaps there is not enough vaccine to go around?
Better to have a "skirmish' caused by rapid retreat ... than a "riot" caused by uncontrollable demand.
hmmmmmmmmmm............
Just because many doctors don't get vaccinated against the flu -- between a third and two-thirds skip it, depending on whose statistics you like -- doesn't mean you should follow their bad example. People at high risk of flu, including doctors and nurses who have contact with ill patients, should certainly get the shot. Good medicine is still good medicine, even if doctors don't follow their own advice.
ReplyDeleteSam.... and there's the "rub" ....
ReplyDelete"what is "good" medecine ?
Sharon -- at my hospital (large, tertiary care center -- we have about 1000 beds) all health care providers, including doctors, are required to get the flu shot.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous .....
ReplyDeleteDo you remember this?
http://www.rense.com/general24/flu.htm
why didn't the paramedics want the flu shot. ....do you recall?