Buy Tadalafil 20 mg – Prices Online are Very Competitive

It’s really a hassle to suffer from erectile dysfunction (ED), especially when you are still very much sexually active.  It is somewhat fortunate though that we now live in an age where there are really effective ED treatment drugs that will allow you to get the erection you need so you can successfully have sexual intercourse.  When it comes to ED drugs, nothing beats tadalafil 20 mg.  Even though Viagra can be said as popular, it is in fact only popular among those who do not actually use or need the drug.  But for those who use ED medication themselves, the best is without doubt tadalafil 20 mg.

Most men who use ED treatment medications these days actually prefer using tadalafil 20 mg over other treatment drugs because tadalafil 20 mg provides them with the longest duration for potential erection than any other ED medication.  Whereas most types of ED drugs will provide you with 4-10 hours of duration for potential erection, tadalafil 20 mg can actually provide you 36 hours, nearly a day and a half of duration for potential erection.

Couples actually prefer this ED medication because their sexual activity is not limited to the short duration that other ED drugs have to offer.  The truth is, it is not just sexually active couples that prefer using tadalafil 20 mg, but also men who frequently have unscheduled sexual intercourse with their female partners.  This is because with tadalafil 20 mg, they have the potential to sport an erection within the timeframe that the tadalafil 20 mg is still in effect. Read more…

What's in the news: August 28

A round-up of Canadian health news, from coast to coast to coast, and beyond, for Thursday, August 28.

The Maple Leaf listeriosis outbreak persists, as the Canadian Press carries a story published in the Chronicle-Herald today under the bold (and quesionable) heading "Listeria could be re-election hazard," going so far as to compare the federal government's food-safety monitoring problems to past issues like the water contamination at Walkerton, and the financial scandals that plagued Paul Martin's Liberal minority.

The Conservatives have dropped their support for Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime Act, a private member's bill proposed by Tory MP Ken Epps that would have made it a separate crime to kill a fetus in the case of a murder of a pregnant woman. Justice Minister Rob Nicholson announced that the government plans instead to introduce legislation that would allow judges to consider pregnancy as an "aggravating factor" when sentencing convicted criminals. Mr Epps, however, says he will continue to stand behind his proposed law even though it is now doomed. Mr Epps is backed by a small group of stalwart supporters in Parliament. The Canadian Medical Association, meanwhile, was eager to take credit for the government's decision to drop C-484, in light of a motion proposed by a delegate last week at the organization's Annual Meeting. The motion opposed "... any legislation that would result in compromising access for women to the medical services required to terminate a pregnancy." [CMA News]

Quebec will not open its own safe-injection site for drug addicts, after all. Health Minister Yves Bolduc's office said last week, sounding uncannily like Tony Clement's cadre, that there isn't enough evidence yet to justify opening a facility similar to Vancouver's Insite. The announcement has angered a number of advocacy groups and public health workers, as well as the separatist opposition party, the Parti Québecois.

Should codeine be entirely removed from obstetrics wards? That's what a Vancouver perinatologist thinks after reading a study published online by U of T researcher Gideon Koren and others in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. The good doctor's outrage is late in coming, though; the "new" study simply confirms what Dr Koren has been saying for years now about the danger for some genetically predisposed women of breastfeeding while taking codeine. The case in which an infant died as a result happened back in 2005, and the National Review of Medicine covered his research last year.

Dr Gordon Guyatt, the McMaster epidemiology prof and health policy analyst known for coining the term "evidence-based medicine," is sounding more and more like a potential federal Parliamentarian* every day. *Correction: Dr Guyatt is , for the NDP in Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale, in Ontario, and he has run in three previous elections.
I meant to write that he is sounding more like an MP every day.

Check out the most recent edition of Health Wonk Review, featuring the best in health policy writing from the medical blogosphere. Canadian Medicine makes an appearance.