Latest headlines

Loading...

Are You Going to Use Finasteride for Hair Loss? Read This First

Sold in the market under the brand names Propecia and Proscar, finasteride is a medication that is intended to treat people who are suffering from hair loss.  In the early days, finasteride was just like other medications that were originally used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. It turns out that patients who took finasteride for their prostate-related issues had experienced great results with it, along with a surprising bonus, and that is, the growth of hair.

Finasteride actually works by means of inhibiting or stopping type II 5-alpha reductase, the enzyme responsible for converting the hormone testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT).  DHT, in turn, is the one responsible for losing one’s hair, resulting to baldness if not remedied.  Thus, simply put, the action of finasteride is to prevent the conversion of testosterone into DHT, and the end result would be the prevention of hair loss. This “favorable side effect” of preventing hair loss and promoting growth of new hair by finasteride is what made it famous in the pharmaceutical world, not by its primary use which is for treating benign prostatic hypertrophy and other prostate-related ailments. Read more…

Doctors celebrate Canada Health Act's 25th anniversary

Decades-old federal legislation is not typically feted with impassioned speeches, popcorn, cake and sangría. The Canada Health Act, however, is not a typical piece of federal legislation.

On Sunday night in a movie theatre in Saskatoon – smack dab in the middle of the place where the first Canadian medicare system took shape under the leadership of Greatest Canadian Tommy Douglas – well over a hundred physicians, nurses, politicians and citizens gathered to celebrate the 1984 law culminating the years and years of incremental progress that led to the single-payer, universal Canadian health-insurance systems now in place in every province and territory.

The 25-year-old legislation's birthday party was thrown by an activist group of physicians known as Canadian Doctors for Medicare, which has set up shop here in Saskatoon in large part to act as a counterweight to the Canadian Medical Association's reformist lobbying.

A large audience turned out to hear keynote speeches given by Canadian Doctors for Medicare chair Dr Danielle Martin (left) and by former Saskatchewan premier and federal health commission leader Roy Romanow (right). Local and national politicians and medical leaders, including new CMA president Anne Doig, NDP MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis, Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions president Linda Silas and others were in attendance.

Mr Romanow's speech began with a recitation of the history of the creation of the Canadian medicare system. He took a few shots at the Conservative federal government, including some pointed comments about Prime Minister Lester B Pearson's accomplishment of negotiating a bill creating universal medicare through Parliament when he was in command of a minority government.

Mr Romanow appealed for government to introduce a universal pharmacare plan, to insure Canadian patients against catastrophic drug costs. He also urged the addition to medicare coverage of home care and palliative care.

Continued vigilance and lobbying will be required to protect and improve Canada's medicare system, Mr Romanow said. “A great responsbility rests on all of us who believe in medicare.”

The ongoing medicare fight represents something more than a battle for the nation's healthcare system, he said. It is a “canary in the coal mine” -- the first point at which the federal government's willingness to stand up for the protection of Canada's social support system is being tested, Mr Romanow said. “We need today an active federal government, to create a functioning, not a warring, federation,” he said, warning against decentralization. “We do not feed a federal government that cedes issues to the provinces and special interests.”

Dr Danielle Martin followed Mr Romanow's speech by arguing that evidence has shown publicly delivered, not-for-profit healthcare to be cheaper and of a higher quality than private, for-profit care. Another advantage, she said, can be seen in the difference between administrative costs in the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada. In the US, administrative costs represent 31% of health spending; in Canada that figure is just 1.3%.

Dr Martin also argued that medicare has not only served patients well but has also been beneficial financially to physicians. In the 1970s and 80s, she said, budget cuts pushed doctors to charge patients directly for care. The Canada Health Act relieved doctors of that burden and instituted a national system that established how physicians would be paid, which in turn, Dr Martin said, led to improved collegiality among doctors because there was less inequality in pay for similar work.

But Dr Martin's goal is not simply to prevent change. She believes, like Dr Doig and Mr Romanow and many others, that medicare must adapt with the times. Dr Martin's goal is to make sure that those adaptations don't threaten the principles that made medicare so valuable to Canadians in the first place. “A better medicare is possible,” she said.

Before the giant birthday cake was cut and the party began, Dr Martin encouraged physicians to think fondly of the 25-year-old legislation. “This,” she said, “is an opportunity for the medical profsesion to realize the Canada Health Act has served us well.”

As attendees got ready to leave, one young med school graduate stood up at a microphone to invite people to her friend's parents' house to drink sangría and continue the conversation about health policy, proving once again that the Canada Health Act truly is an unusual piece of legislation. As Dr Nuala Kenny, the well-known retired Nova Scotia pediatrician and bioethicist, said: just compare the civil tone of Sunday's Canada Health Act discussion to the wildly acrimonious attitudes we've seen on television at the health-insurance reform town-hall meetings taking place now in the United States.

Photo (Danielle Martin): Canadian Doctors for Medicare
Photo (Roy Romanow): Canadian Institute of Wellbeing


Get Canadian Medicine news by email or in an RSS reader

3 comments:

  1. sharon18 August, 2009 8:47 AM

    Romanow ...as usual... spot on!

    Key comments:

    1. on the "decentralized" provision of care

    'He also urged the addition to medicare coverage of home care and palliative care.'

    2. on the "centralized" planning of care

    'We do not feed a federal government that cedes issues to the provinces and special interests.'

    KEY: Keep both under " federal" jurisdiction


    ASIDE:

    It is one of my life goals to meet Dr. Nuala Kenny...and to live long enough to read all of her writings :)

    Delete
  2. products for hair loss28 August, 2009 4:39 AM

    That is a good way of thinking

    Delete
  3. seo service21 March, 2012 10:38 PM

    Staged by the Canadian Doctors for Medicare, it was an earnest affair.

    But it was also a sober reminder that, despite Canadians' jingoistic love for medicare, they know appallingly little about its legal basis and its history, never mind its strengths and weaknesses.

    Medicare - the name Canadians give to state-administered health insurance - has evolved slowly over six decades and it remains a work in progress.

    Delete