tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post6620553868774918254..comments2008-10-10T09:40:52.733-04:00Adminnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post-17755337330021523982008-10-08T23:48:00.000-04:002008-10-08T23:48:00.000-04:00

Which blogs did this study choose? Different blogs have very different missions even though they all fall under some general umbrella of a "medical" blog. A lot of these are just people venting about their job and perhaps sharing a funny anecdote. Given that, it seems unlikely they'll see the need to post a retraction if its just some minor fact.

Khttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06085551514647174816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post-1839183322065538502008-10-04T11:09:00.000-04:002008-10-04T11:09:00.000-04:00

....this is reflective of recognised expertise(taught at graduate level)<BR/><BR/>http://dailyinterview.net/?p=159<BR/><BR/>P.S. looking forward to broader "qualitative" research on this matter<BR/>( beyond subjectively reactive )

sharonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07118658299069243822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post-33498600293737119322008-10-02T21:14:00.000-04:002008-10-02T21:14:00.000-04:00

Canadian Medicine is the editors' blog of Parkhurst Exchange magazine, written by professional journalists.<BR/><BR/>Yes? Who are these journalist? I see that SAM SOLOMON wrote this article. Who is he? Where is his contact information and where is his biography?

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post-48213513059955541232008-10-02T21:06:00.000-04:002008-10-02T21:06:00.000-04:00

You are completely putting things out of context. If you are going to show some data, then show everything. These were multiple choice questions, and you showed only percentages of those choosing often. Why not show everything. Also, why not show all practices, why leave out the one with the highest percentage. Also why not say that the participants in the survey all provided direct contact

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-475000734620346734.post-54884575265345443142008-10-02T13:23:00.000-04:002008-10-02T13:23:00.000-04:00

speaking of "fallacies" ( e.g. accent fallacy)<BR/><BR/>Which is the emphasis in their introductory statement?<BR/><BR/>....whether or not they follow practices "associated" with journalism.( a legal disclaimer approach)<BR/><BR/>OR<BR/><BR/>.....whether or not they follow" practices" associated with journalism.( a promise of proofs? )<BR/><BR/>OR<BR/><BR/>..... whether or not they" follow"

sharonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07118658299069243822noreply@blogger.com